Mark-Q Overlaps VI: The Direction of Dependence

This is the sixth and final post in my current series on the Mark-Q Overlaps (so-called), in which I would like to build on the issue of the...

Mark-Q Overlaps V: the degree of verbatim agreement

This is the fifth in my current series of posts on the Mark-Q Overlaps (so-called), in which I would like to make a new point about the degr...

Mark-Q Overlaps IV: Back to the Continuum

This is the fourth in my current series of posts on the Mark-Q Overlaps (so-called). In this post, I respond to a second point of critique ...

Mark-Q Overlaps III: Minor Agreements between Mark and Luke

This is now the third post in the current series on Mark-Q Overlaps, in which I would like to respond to comments from Christopher Tuckett i...

Mark-Q Overlaps II: Major Agreements Between Matthew and Luke

In my first post on this topic , I suggested that the term "Mark Q Overlap" is problematic because it names the data set by using ...

Mark Q Overlaps I: Terminology

At this year's SBL Annual Meeting I am speaking in the Q Section. The topic of the session in question is the Mark Q Overlaps, and ther...

SBL Annual Meeting: My Papers

Several have noted that the SBL Annual Meeting 2007 Program Book is now online. I have two papers this year, and it's a case of out wi...